Who wore it best: Aff and May’s magenta dress

Give “May” Pitchanart Sakakorn a brown grocery bag to wear and somehow she will work it, make it look sexy, show off her curves. Walk down a catwalk wearing a brown grocery bag, May can do it with confidence and have all the men’s eyes on her. Some woman can do that. It’s call confidence falling in the category of sexual prowess without the sex, just the skill to entice.

When you think May Pitchanart, you think sex, lust, a killer bod, a girl you envy if you were a flat-chested girl with issues. May can do that to you. Now lets examine Aff. She gives off a different perspective. A different look. She is a classic. To look at Aff, you DON’T think sex instead the word ‘elegance’ comes to mind. Just because one is prominently known as the hot girl and the other as a classic beauty, neither is inferior to each other. They JUST have different looks. Just wanted to point that out before I moved on.

I was amuse by this. This morning I was looking at pictures of Aff in Sudsapda magazine (she is on the cover for this month), one picture stood out. The one with Aff in the magenta/zipper in the front dress, she was posing like she was all that. She is, she knows it. That is not the point. The point is this, clothes embody you not the other way around. Like the saying, clothes don’t make you, rather it is an expression subconsciously predetermined by you. That’s my interpretation. May wore the exact same dress to the premier of “Sex in the City 2″ in Thailand or a showcase for the film weeks ago. On May it gave off a different impression.

We have here one dress, the color of magenta, worn by two women of different looks and personality–one is outgoing, part of the party-girl club, she has curves, boobs (sorry for the language). The other is reserved and quiet. The dress embodies the girl’s personality. On May, it’s all about lust. On Aff, I see chicness, simplicity. No lust, no sex. It was a complete 360, you don’t see that often.

May.